<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1244 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276505</link>
    <description>The article examines a challenge to the appointment of a Director General of Police, with objections based on alleged corruption material, non-forwarding of incriminating documents to the UPSC, and the request for a CBI probe. It notes that the appointment was treated as a fresh appointment under the Prakash Singh tenure guidelines, that the alleged bribery material lacked direct corroboration against the officer concerned, and that uncorroborated allegations did not justify withholding material from the UPSC. It also stresses that the Vigilance Directorate should function independently, with a separate Vigilance Commissioner, to secure an impartial enquiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:46:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1244 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276505</link>
      <description>The article examines a challenge to the appointment of a Director General of Police, with objections based on alleged corruption material, non-forwarding of incriminating documents to the UPSC, and the request for a CBI probe. It notes that the appointment was treated as a fresh appointment under the Prakash Singh tenure guidelines, that the alleged bribery material lacked direct corroboration against the officer concerned, and that uncorroborated allegations did not justify withholding material from the UPSC. It also stresses that the Vigilance Directorate should function independently, with a separate Vigilance Commissioner, to secure an impartial enquiry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>