https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276474 The Court dismissed the petitions challenging the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951, upholding the insertion of Articles 31A and 31B. It held that the provisional Parliament had the competence to amend the Constitution under Article 368, validated the President's adaptation of Article 368 under Article 392, and ruled that the Amendment Act did not violate Article 13(2) or necessitate ratification by State Legislatures. Additionally, it determined that Articles 31A and 31B were not ultra vires despite relating to matters in List II of the Seventh Schedule. en-us Fri, 05 Oct 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:47:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276474 The Court dismissed the petitions challenging the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951, upholding the insertion of Articles 31A and 31B. It held that the provisional Parliament had the competence to amend the Constitution under Article 368, validated the President's adaptation of Article 368 under Article 392, and ruled that the Amendment Act did not violate Article 13(2) or necessitate ratification by State Legislatures. Additionally, it determined that Articles 31A and 31B were not ultra vires despite relating to matters in List II of the Seventh Schedule. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Oct 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276474