<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (8) TMI 56 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276472</link>
    <description>Where an assessee&#039;s business consists in acquiring, holding and disposing of managing agencies, compensation received on voluntary relinquishment of one agency in the ordinary course of that business is a trading receipt. The Calcutta HC treated the payment as arising from a composite commercial arrangement, noting that the managing agency was part of the assessee&#039;s ordinary trading operations and not a sterilised capital asset. Because the resignation was voluntary and did not amount to a forced cessation or material impairment of the business structure, the receipt was held to be revenue in nature and assessable to tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:41:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (8) TMI 56 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276472</link>
      <description>Where an assessee&#039;s business consists in acquiring, holding and disposing of managing agencies, compensation received on voluntary relinquishment of one agency in the ordinary course of that business is a trading receipt. The Calcutta HC treated the payment as arising from a composite commercial arrangement, noting that the managing agency was part of the assessee&#039;s ordinary trading operations and not a sterilised capital asset. Because the resignation was voluntary and did not amount to a forced cessation or material impairment of the business structure, the receipt was held to be revenue in nature and assessable to tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>