<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (5) TMI 266 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276464</link>
    <description>Under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, a tenant is treated as the deemed purchaser on the tillers&#039; day where the landlord is not under any statutory disability, and the landlord&#039;s interest then stands extinguished. Section 32-F applies only if the landlord is a minor, widow, or otherwise under mental or physical disability on that date, so it cannot postpone purchase in other cases. Proceedings based on the mistaken assumption that the tenancy continued after statutory purchase are void for want of jurisdiction, and eviction or transfer orders founded on such an error cannot stand. Where the sale by the recorded owner is ineffective, transferees acquire no title and restoration of possession to the tenant&#039;s heir is supportable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 14:52:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (5) TMI 266 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276464</link>
      <description>Under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, a tenant is treated as the deemed purchaser on the tillers&#039; day where the landlord is not under any statutory disability, and the landlord&#039;s interest then stands extinguished. Section 32-F applies only if the landlord is a minor, widow, or otherwise under mental or physical disability on that date, so it cannot postpone purchase in other cases. Proceedings based on the mistaken assumption that the tenancy continued after statutory purchase are void for want of jurisdiction, and eviction or transfer orders founded on such an error cannot stand. Where the sale by the recorded owner is ineffective, transferees acquire no title and restoration of possession to the tenant&#039;s heir is supportable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>