https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276461 European British subject status could be waived, and once the accused relinquished that special status, the Court of Session retained jurisdiction. For Chapter VI offences, governmental authorisation had to specifically cover the charge under Section 121 of the Indian Penal Code; a sanction that did not include that section was ineffective for that prosecution. Confessions recorded by the District Magistrate were admissible because they were voluntary and complied with Section 164 safeguards. The evidence did not prove waging war under Section 121, but it did establish conspiracy under Section 121A against those shown to have joined the unlawful design, while the separate conviction under Section 122 was set aside and sentences were modified accordingly. en-us Tue, 23 Nov 1909 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Nov 2018 14:38:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276461 European British subject status could be waived, and once the accused relinquished that special status, the Court of Session retained jurisdiction. For Chapter VI offences, governmental authorisation had to specifically cover the charge under Section 121 of the Indian Penal Code; a sanction that did not include that section was ineffective for that prosecution. Confessions recorded by the District Magistrate were admissible because they were voluntary and complied with Section 164 safeguards. The evidence did not prove waging war under Section 121, but it did establish conspiracy under Section 121A against those shown to have joined the unlawful design, while the separate conviction under Section 122 was set aside and sentences were modified accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Nov 1909 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276461