<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (7) TMI 108 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276456</link>
    <description>A Mitakshara coparcener&#039;s death triggers a notional partition immediately before death under the Hindu Succession Act to ascertain the deceased&#039;s share, and that share then devolves by succession on female Class I heirs, enabling them to claim partition. The document also states that where joint family nucleus is shown, property built from earlier family assets is presumed joint family property unless separate acquisition is proved. Section 23 further limits partition of a dwelling house by postponing division of the occupied residential portion until the male heir elects to divide it, while divisible portions may still be partitioned according to shares.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 14:17:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (7) TMI 108 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276456</link>
      <description>A Mitakshara coparcener&#039;s death triggers a notional partition immediately before death under the Hindu Succession Act to ascertain the deceased&#039;s share, and that share then devolves by succession on female Class I heirs, enabling them to claim partition. The document also states that where joint family nucleus is shown, property built from earlier family assets is presumed joint family property unless separate acquisition is proved. Section 23 further limits partition of a dwelling house by postponing division of the occupied residential portion until the male heir elects to divide it, while divisible portions may still be partitioned according to shares.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>