https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276449 A preliminary inquiry for compulsory acquisition under Section 40 was held to be under governmental control and did not require notice to, or participation by, the landowner because the statute made no express or implied provision for it. The contrast with the compensation stage, where the Act expressly required notice and service on interested persons, confirmed that the legislature treated the two stages differently. The Collector's inquiry into compensation and award was also treated as administrative, not judicial, so prior disclosure of all departmental material was not required. The objections to both stages failed, and the declaration and proceedings remained valid. en-us Fri, 03 Mar 1905 00:00:00 +0521 Mon, 12 Nov 2018 12:52:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276449 A preliminary inquiry for compulsory acquisition under Section 40 was held to be under governmental control and did not require notice to, or participation by, the landowner because the statute made no express or implied provision for it. The contrast with the compensation stage, where the Act expressly required notice and service on interested persons, confirmed that the legislature treated the two stages differently. The Collector's inquiry into compensation and award was also treated as administrative, not judicial, so prior disclosure of all departmental material was not required. The objections to both stages failed, and the declaration and proceedings remained valid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Mar 1905 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276449