<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 35 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15145</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under section 271B of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing total immunity from penal proceedings under the amnesty scheme and related circulars. The court clarified that the intention of the circulars was to grant immunity from penalties of all nature for voluntary disclosures, leading to the dismissal of penalty initiation and levy on a return filed under the &quot;amnesty scheme.&quot;</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:06:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 35 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15145</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under section 271B of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing total immunity from penal proceedings under the amnesty scheme and related circulars. The court clarified that the intention of the circulars was to grant immunity from penalties of all nature for voluntary disclosures, leading to the dismissal of penalty initiation and levy on a return filed under the &quot;amnesty scheme.&quot;</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>