<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (4) TMI 113 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276445</link>
    <description>Where a service cadre is drawn from direct recruits and promotees, and the earlier quota and seniority arrangement collapses, the State may introduce a fresh roster-based seniority rule to restore administrative order. The rule for Income-tax Officers, operating from 16-1-1959, notionally allocated posts on a 1:1 basis and fixed inter se seniority between the two streams. The Court treated this as a rational substitute for a broken system, noting that officiating or ad hoc promotee appointments had left seniority unresolved. The ratio states that such a rule does not infringe Article 16 if it is fair, non-arbitrary, and designed to regularise the cadre.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 12:02:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (4) TMI 113 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276445</link>
      <description>Where a service cadre is drawn from direct recruits and promotees, and the earlier quota and seniority arrangement collapses, the State may introduce a fresh roster-based seniority rule to restore administrative order. The rule for Income-tax Officers, operating from 16-1-1959, notionally allocated posts on a 1:1 basis and fixed inter se seniority between the two streams. The Court treated this as a rational substitute for a broken system, noting that officiating or ad hoc promotee appointments had left seniority unresolved. The ratio states that such a rule does not infringe Article 16 if it is fair, non-arbitrary, and designed to regularise the cadre.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>