<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 33 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15143</link>
    <description>Weighted deduction under section 35B(1)(b)(ii) was confined to expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively on obtaining information about markets outside India. Commission paid to local agents of foreign buyers was treated as being connected with actual sales and procurement of export orders, not with market information, and was therefore outside the provision. The distinction between procuring orders and obtaining market information was reaffirmed, and the assessee&#039;s claim for weighted deduction on such commission was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:00:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 33 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15143</link>
      <description>Weighted deduction under section 35B(1)(b)(ii) was confined to expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively on obtaining information about markets outside India. Commission paid to local agents of foreign buyers was treated as being connected with actual sales and procurement of export orders, not with market information, and was therefore outside the provision. The distinction between procuring orders and obtaining market information was reaffirmed, and the assessee&#039;s claim for weighted deduction on such commission was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>