<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 518 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370175</link>
    <description>The Court directed the respondent authorities to release the petitioner&#039;s goods and vehicle upon the petitioner furnishing a Bank Guarantee for tax and penalty due, along with a bond for the value of goods as prescribed under Rule 140(1) of the CGST Rules. The Court disposed of the writ petition with this direction, providing relief to the petitioner based on the precedent set by the earlier judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 518 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370175</link>
      <description>The Court directed the respondent authorities to release the petitioner&#039;s goods and vehicle upon the petitioner furnishing a Bank Guarantee for tax and penalty due, along with a bond for the value of goods as prescribed under Rule 140(1) of the CGST Rules. The Court disposed of the writ petition with this direction, providing relief to the petitioner based on the precedent set by the earlier judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>