<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 512 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370169</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the penalty order imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the invalid notice issued by the AO. The judgment emphasized the importance of specifying the grounds for penalty in such notices, in line with legal precedents, ultimately leading to the quashing of the penalty order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:07:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 512 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370169</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the penalty order imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the invalid notice issued by the AO. The judgment emphasized the importance of specifying the grounds for penalty in such notices, in line with legal precedents, ultimately leading to the quashing of the penalty order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>