<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 511 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370168</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed regarding the denial of deduction under Sec.54 of the Income Tax Act. The court emphasized the significance of the timing of possession of the new residential property in determining eligibility for the deduction. The judgment highlighted the importance of factual circumstances and legal interpretations in assessing tax deductions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:07:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 511 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370168</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed regarding the denial of deduction under Sec.54 of the Income Tax Act. The court emphasized the significance of the timing of possession of the new residential property in determining eligibility for the deduction. The judgment highlighted the importance of factual circumstances and legal interpretations in assessing tax deductions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>