https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370163 The Tribunal upheld the additions of Rs. 3,06,150/- and Rs. 18,11,765/- in the assessee's HDFC Bank and Kotak Mahindra Bank accounts, respectively. The Tribunal found the explanations provided by the assessee for the deposits lacking in credibility and evidence. The judgment emphasized the importance of substantiating claims with proper documentation and providing credible explanations for cash deposits in bank accounts. en-us Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:06:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370163 The Tribunal upheld the additions of Rs. 3,06,150/- and Rs. 18,11,765/- in the assessee's HDFC Bank and Kotak Mahindra Bank accounts, respectively. The Tribunal found the explanations provided by the assessee for the deposits lacking in credibility and evidence. The judgment emphasized the importance of substantiating claims with proper documentation and providing credible explanations for cash deposits in bank accounts. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370163