<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 502 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370159</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the show cause notices for final assessment based on test reports of imported Zinc Skimming. It found the delay of over five years in issuing the notices unjustified, emphasizing the need for timely adjudication. The court also questioned the reliability of laboratory testing reports for such goods, highlighting inconsistencies that could impact the assessment process. Additionally, the judgment clarified the interpretation of statutory provisions regarding final assessment periods, underscoring the importance of adherence to reasonable time frames in the absence of specific guidelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2020 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 502 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370159</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the show cause notices for final assessment based on test reports of imported Zinc Skimming. It found the delay of over five years in issuing the notices unjustified, emphasizing the need for timely adjudication. The court also questioned the reliability of laboratory testing reports for such goods, highlighting inconsistencies that could impact the assessment process. Additionally, the judgment clarified the interpretation of statutory provisions regarding final assessment periods, underscoring the importance of adherence to reasonable time frames in the absence of specific guidelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>