<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 501 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370158</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the penalties imposed on M/s HLPL and its Director under Section 114AA of the Customs Act for deliberate overvaluation of imported goods. It was found that they failed to verify KYC norms adequately and the show cause notice issued under Section 110(2) was deemed valid under Section 124. The appellants&#039; lack of verification of the importer&#039;s address and authenticity led to the rejection of their appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 501 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370158</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the penalties imposed on M/s HLPL and its Director under Section 114AA of the Customs Act for deliberate overvaluation of imported goods. It was found that they failed to verify KYC norms adequately and the show cause notice issued under Section 110(2) was deemed valid under Section 124. The appellants&#039; lack of verification of the importer&#039;s address and authenticity led to the rejection of their appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>