https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370154 Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure gives the court wide discretionary power to summon, recall, or re-examine evidence at any stage, but that power must be exercised judicially to secure the truth and a just decision. A request to produce relevant material cannot be rejected on a general apprehension of prejudice where the document has a clear nexus with the dispute and its receipt would aid proper adjudication. The Himachal Pradesh High Court held that the pronote was prima facie connected to the transaction underlying the Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint, so refusal to permit its production was unsustainable and the application ought to have been allowed. en-us Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:06:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370154 Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure gives the court wide discretionary power to summon, recall, or re-examine evidence at any stage, but that power must be exercised judicially to secure the truth and a just decision. A request to produce relevant material cannot be rejected on a general apprehension of prejudice where the document has a clear nexus with the dispute and its receipt would aid proper adjudication. The Himachal Pradesh High Court held that the pronote was prima facie connected to the transaction underlying the Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint, so refusal to permit its production was unsustainable and the application ought to have been allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370154