<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 495 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370152</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. Demands related to income from insurance companies, IGNOU, PTU, and tuition fees for short-term vocational courses were dropped. However, demands related to hiring charges from IGNOU, income from IIHT, miscellaneous income, and income not forming part of the profit &amp;amp; loss account were confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:06:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 495 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370152</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. Demands related to income from insurance companies, IGNOU, PTU, and tuition fees for short-term vocational courses were dropped. However, demands related to hiring charges from IGNOU, income from IIHT, miscellaneous income, and income not forming part of the profit &amp;amp; loss account were confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>