https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370151 The Court found that the order challenged under Article 226 of the Constitution breached principles of natural justice as the appellant was not provided with a crucial report relied upon by the Commissioner. The Court emphasized that denying the appellant the opportunity to address the adverse report violated natural justice. The initial judgment dismissing the breach of natural justice claim was overturned, and the Commissioner's order was set aside for fresh consideration within four months, with the report to be disclosed to the appellant. The appeal was successful, and no costs were awarded. en-us Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:05:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370151 The Court found that the order challenged under Article 226 of the Constitution breached principles of natural justice as the appellant was not provided with a crucial report relied upon by the Commissioner. The Court emphasized that denying the appellant the opportunity to address the adverse report violated natural justice. The initial judgment dismissing the breach of natural justice claim was overturned, and the Commissioner's order was set aside for fresh consideration within four months, with the report to be disclosed to the appellant. The appeal was successful, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370151