<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 490 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370147</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order denying CENVAT credit to M/s Akzo Nobel India Ltd on &#039;speciality polymers&#039; re-packed and re-labelled before clearance. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal held that since the duty paid exceeded the credit availed, the appellant was not obligated to reverse the credit. The penalty imposition was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellant. The judgment was pronounced on 06/11/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:05:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 490 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370147</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order denying CENVAT credit to M/s Akzo Nobel India Ltd on &#039;speciality polymers&#039; re-packed and re-labelled before clearance. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal held that since the duty paid exceeded the credit availed, the appellant was not obligated to reverse the credit. The penalty imposition was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellant. The judgment was pronounced on 06/11/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>