<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 488 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370145</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a chemical manufacturer with multiple factories, in a case concerning the disallowance of CENVAT Credit at their Ranipet factory. The Tribunal found that the Revenue&#039;s invocation of the extended period of limitation was unjustified, as there was no evidence of suppression. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order, allowing the appeal and granting consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:05:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 488 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370145</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a chemical manufacturer with multiple factories, in a case concerning the disallowance of CENVAT Credit at their Ranipet factory. The Tribunal found that the Revenue&#039;s invocation of the extended period of limitation was unjustified, as there was no evidence of suppression. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order, allowing the appeal and granting consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>