<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (1) TMI 38 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276423</link>
    <description>A tenancy is assessed by its dominant purpose, so premises used mainly as a motor repair workshop with only subsidiary manufacturing activity fall within the residuary class and require only fifteen days&#039; notice to quit. A sale in compulsory winding up is treated as a transfer by operation of law, not a voluntary transfer by the tenant, and so does not attract the rent-control disqualification in provisos (a) and (b). The landlord&#039;s reasonable requirement for own occupation may extend to occupation after building or rebuilding, and comparative hardship is relevant. Where the extent of partial eviction cannot be fairly determined on the record, remand for fresh consideration is appropriate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2018 13:22:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (1) TMI 38 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276423</link>
      <description>A tenancy is assessed by its dominant purpose, so premises used mainly as a motor repair workshop with only subsidiary manufacturing activity fall within the residuary class and require only fifteen days&#039; notice to quit. A sale in compulsory winding up is treated as a transfer by operation of law, not a voluntary transfer by the tenant, and so does not attract the rent-control disqualification in provisos (a) and (b). The landlord&#039;s reasonable requirement for own occupation may extend to occupation after building or rebuilding, and comparative hardship is relevant. Where the extent of partial eviction cannot be fairly determined on the record, remand for fresh consideration is appropriate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>