<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 18 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15136</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the family allowance received by the assessee was not exempt from taxation and should be considered as part of his salary, to be assessed under the head &quot;Salary&quot; for taxation purposes. The Court rejected the assessee&#039;s claim that the allowance was intended for family maintenance and not part of his salary, affirming the Income-tax Officer&#039;s assessment and overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:34:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 18 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15136</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the family allowance received by the assessee was not exempt from taxation and should be considered as part of his salary, to be assessed under the head &quot;Salary&quot; for taxation purposes. The Court rejected the assessee&#039;s claim that the allowance was intended for family maintenance and not part of his salary, affirming the Income-tax Officer&#039;s assessment and overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>