<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 26 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15135</link>
    <description>Payment under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme was treated as valid where the tax was paid within time and received by the Department, because the scheme did not make use of a departmental challan form a condition precedent to compliance. An objection based only on the challan format was therefore held immaterial, and the payment was to be adjusted as valid under the scheme. The assessing authority was directed to proceed further and pass final orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:32:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 26 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15135</link>
      <description>Payment under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme was treated as valid where the tax was paid within time and received by the Department, because the scheme did not make use of a departmental challan form a condition precedent to compliance. An objection based only on the challan format was therefore held immaterial, and the payment was to be adjusted as valid under the scheme. The assessing authority was directed to proceed further and pass final orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>