<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (2) TMI 186 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276411</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition as it found no merit in the petitioner&#039;s contentions. The detention was upheld as valid under the law, with allegations of mala fides and vagueness of grounds not substantiated. The court clarified the distinction between detention and punishment, emphasizing constitutional principles guiding such measures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2018 11:44:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (2) TMI 186 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276411</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition as it found no merit in the petitioner&#039;s contentions. The detention was upheld as valid under the law, with allegations of mala fides and vagueness of grounds not substantiated. The court clarified the distinction between detention and punishment, emphasizing constitutional principles guiding such measures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>