<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 31 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15132</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the circuit house maintained by the assessee qualifies as a guest house under section 37(4) of the Income-tax Act, disallowing the expenditure and depreciation claims. The Court also ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the entitlement to depreciation on roads inside the factory, following the Supreme Court precedent. The decision favored the Revenue over the assessee on the issue of the circuit house&#039;s classification as a guest house.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:17:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 31 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15132</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the circuit house maintained by the assessee qualifies as a guest house under section 37(4) of the Income-tax Act, disallowing the expenditure and depreciation claims. The Court also ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the entitlement to depreciation on roads inside the factory, following the Supreme Court precedent. The decision favored the Revenue over the assessee on the issue of the circuit house&#039;s classification as a guest house.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>