<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 802 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276401</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad upheld the CIT (A) order, directing the AO to estimate net profit at 3% of purchases or stock put for sale during the year, based on a previous decision involving M/s Kanaka Durga Wines. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ensuring the assessed income is not less than the returned income. Consequently, the Cross Objection filed by the assessee was also dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2018 09:54:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 802 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276401</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad upheld the CIT (A) order, directing the AO to estimate net profit at 3% of purchases or stock put for sale during the year, based on a previous decision involving M/s Kanaka Durga Wines. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ensuring the assessed income is not less than the returned income. Consequently, the Cross Objection filed by the assessee was also dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>