<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 480 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370137</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the Revenue, finding that CIT (A) erred in deleting the demands prematurely. The Tribunal emphasized that final assessment was pending, demands were to be examined during assessment proceedings, and highlighted the importance of following correct TDS rates under the DTAA and the need for proper verification before deleting demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2018 13:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 480 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370137</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the Revenue, finding that CIT (A) erred in deleting the demands prematurely. The Tribunal emphasized that final assessment was pending, demands were to be examined during assessment proceedings, and highlighted the importance of following correct TDS rates under the DTAA and the need for proper verification before deleting demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>