<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 479 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370136</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, ruling the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 as legally untenable. Consequently, the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) was deemed unsustainable and canceled. The Tribunal stressed the significance of meeting jurisdictional conditions before reopening assessments, particularly after the lapse of four years from the relevant assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 479 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370136</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, ruling the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 as legally untenable. Consequently, the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) was deemed unsustainable and canceled. The Tribunal stressed the significance of meeting jurisdictional conditions before reopening assessments, particularly after the lapse of four years from the relevant assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>