<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 476 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370133</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act, amounting to Rs. 2,33,50,158, as the transactions were sales of material, not work contracts subject to Section 194C. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the deletion of an addition of Rs. 68,288 under section 14A of the I.T. Act, as no borrowed funds were used for share investments, and Rule 8D disallowance was inapplicable. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, supporting the decisions of the Ld. CIT(A) on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2018 07:13:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 476 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370133</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act, amounting to Rs. 2,33,50,158, as the transactions were sales of material, not work contracts subject to Section 194C. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the deletion of an addition of Rs. 68,288 under section 14A of the I.T. Act, as no borrowed funds were used for share investments, and Rule 8D disallowance was inapplicable. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, supporting the decisions of the Ld. CIT(A) on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>