<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 472 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370129</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals of the assessee concerning the addition in the value of closing stock due to claimed weight-loss for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11. While acknowledging the plausibility of the explanation provided by the assessee regarding different weighment methods, the Tribunal noted a consistent pattern in the claimed losses over the years, raising suspicions of manipulation. Despite the lack of concrete evidence, the Tribunal sustained an adhoc disallowance of a specific amount in each assessment year to address potential manipulation, ultimately restricting the addition and deleting the balance for both years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2018 07:13:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 472 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370129</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals of the assessee concerning the addition in the value of closing stock due to claimed weight-loss for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11. While acknowledging the plausibility of the explanation provided by the assessee regarding different weighment methods, the Tribunal noted a consistent pattern in the claimed losses over the years, raising suspicions of manipulation. Despite the lack of concrete evidence, the Tribunal sustained an adhoc disallowance of a specific amount in each assessment year to address potential manipulation, ultimately restricting the addition and deleting the balance for both years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>