<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 467 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370124</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Notice of Motion seeking a stay of the impugned order dated 24th April 2017 in a pending Appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1966. The Court emphasized the requirement for exceptional circumstances to justify a stay and clarified the temporary nature of ad-interim stays, noting that the mere admission of an Appeal does not automatically warrant a stay of the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2018 07:13:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 467 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370124</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Notice of Motion seeking a stay of the impugned order dated 24th April 2017 in a pending Appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1966. The Court emphasized the requirement for exceptional circumstances to justify a stay and clarified the temporary nature of ad-interim stays, noting that the mere admission of an Appeal does not automatically warrant a stay of the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>