https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370124 Admission of an appeal by itself does not justify a stay of the impugned Tribunal order, as it only indicates that debatable issues arise. The earlier ad-interim protection had been granted for removal of office objections and had already lapsed. In the absence of extraordinary circumstances, the successful party before the Tribunal was entitled to retain the benefit of the order, and there was no basis to keep the deposited amount with the Revenue pending appeal. The request for interim protection was therefore rejected, leaving the Tribunal's order operative without stay. en-us Fri, 19 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Nov 2018 07:13:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370124 Admission of an appeal by itself does not justify a stay of the impugned Tribunal order, as it only indicates that debatable issues arise. The earlier ad-interim protection had been granted for removal of office objections and had already lapsed. In the absence of extraordinary circumstances, the successful party before the Tribunal was entitled to retain the benefit of the order, and there was no basis to keep the deposited amount with the Revenue pending appeal. The request for interim protection was therefore rejected, leaving the Tribunal's order operative without stay. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 19 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370124