https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370123 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the appellant's Customs Broker Licence, finding it unjustified, and restored the licence for ten years from the date of the order. The forfeiture of the security amount was also deemed unjustified and set aside. The appellant was not required to comply with certain regulations as they applied to new applicants, not existing licensees. The Tribunal directed the extension of the validity of the appellant's CHA Licence and rejected allegations of suppression of facts and submission of false documents. The pendency of criminal proceedings was not a valid reason for revocation, leading to the restoration of the appellant's licence. en-us Tue, 06 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Mar 2020 14:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370123 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the appellant's Customs Broker Licence, finding it unjustified, and restored the licence for ten years from the date of the order. The forfeiture of the security amount was also deemed unjustified and set aside. The appellant was not required to comply with certain regulations as they applied to new applicants, not existing licensees. The Tribunal directed the extension of the validity of the appellant's CHA Licence and rejected allegations of suppression of facts and submission of false documents. The pendency of criminal proceedings was not a valid reason for revocation, leading to the restoration of the appellant's licence. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 06 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370123