<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 461 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370118</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that no demand is sustainable against the appellant under the reverse charge mechanism for services rendered outside India. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2018 07:12:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 461 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370118</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that no demand is sustainable against the appellant under the reverse charge mechanism for services rendered outside India. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>