<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 460 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370117</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were not eligible for credit on outward transportation of goods to the buyer&#039;s premises based on a Supreme Court decision. The penalty imposed was deemed unjustified due to interpretational issues taken to the Supreme Court, resulting in the removal of the penalty while maintaining the demand and interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2018 07:12:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 460 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370117</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were not eligible for credit on outward transportation of goods to the buyer&#039;s premises based on a Supreme Court decision. The penalty imposed was deemed unjustified due to interpretational issues taken to the Supreme Court, resulting in the removal of the penalty while maintaining the demand and interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>