<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 454 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370111</link>
    <description>The impugned order was set aside, and both appeals were allowed by way of remand for further examination by the original adjudicating authority. The parties were granted the opportunity to contest all issues with the production of necessary evidence, emphasizing that no opinion on the merits was expressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2018 07:11:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 454 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370111</link>
      <description>The impugned order was set aside, and both appeals were allowed by way of remand for further examination by the original adjudicating authority. The parties were granted the opportunity to contest all issues with the production of necessary evidence, emphasizing that no opinion on the merits was expressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>