<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 440 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370097</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals, holding that the transactions were genuine and supported by adequate evidence. The additions under Section 68 were deleted, and Section 115BBE was deemed inapplicable. Issues regarding 26AS mismatch and HRA deduction were remanded for fresh assessment. The decision emphasized natural justice, evidentiary standards, and consistency with prior judicial rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 19:04:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 440 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370097</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals, holding that the transactions were genuine and supported by adequate evidence. The additions under Section 68 were deleted, and Section 115BBE was deemed inapplicable. Issues regarding 26AS mismatch and HRA deduction were remanded for fresh assessment. The decision emphasized natural justice, evidentiary standards, and consistency with prior judicial rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>