<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 432 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370089</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A))&#039;s decision that the limitation period for rectification proceedings should be counted from the original assessment order dated 31.03.2006, not the subsequent order dated 02.08.2010. The ITAT ruled that the rectification sought by the Assessing Officer (AO) related to the original assessment order and not the later order, making the order dated 15.10.2010 time-barred. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the CIT(A)&#039;s decision was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 19:03:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 432 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370089</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A))&#039;s decision that the limitation period for rectification proceedings should be counted from the original assessment order dated 31.03.2006, not the subsequent order dated 02.08.2010. The ITAT ruled that the rectification sought by the Assessing Officer (AO) related to the original assessment order and not the later order, making the order dated 15.10.2010 time-barred. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the CIT(A)&#039;s decision was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>