<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 431 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370088</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by restricting the disallowance to 12.5% of the bogus purchases and dismissing the deduction claim under section 80IB(10) due to the nature of the purchases. The decision was based on the principle that only the profit element from such transactions should be added to the assessee&#039;s income, following established legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 19:03:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 431 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370088</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by restricting the disallowance to 12.5% of the bogus purchases and dismissing the deduction claim under section 80IB(10) due to the nature of the purchases. The decision was based on the principle that only the profit element from such transactions should be added to the assessee&#039;s income, following established legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>