<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 429 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370086</link>
    <description>Commission expenditure supported by agent details, PAN, bills, account-payee cheque payments and TDS was treated as allowable business expenditure where the revenue failed to conduct adequate enquiry to disprove the claim. The text also states that section 54F, being a beneficial provision, should be applied liberally, but relief was confined to the residential portion of a new building where the evidence showed residential use of the upper floors and no commercial activity in the premises. The apportionment made by the first appellate authority was described as reasonable, and the revenue&#039;s appeal failed in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 19:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 429 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370086</link>
      <description>Commission expenditure supported by agent details, PAN, bills, account-payee cheque payments and TDS was treated as allowable business expenditure where the revenue failed to conduct adequate enquiry to disprove the claim. The text also states that section 54F, being a beneficial provision, should be applied liberally, but relief was confined to the residential portion of a new building where the evidence showed residential use of the upper floors and no commercial activity in the premises. The apportionment made by the first appellate authority was described as reasonable, and the revenue&#039;s appeal failed in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>