<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 425 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370082</link>
    <description>The court emphasized the availability of statutory remedies under the Customs Act for aggrieved parties and declined to entertain the plea under its extraordinary jurisdiction. Instead, it directed the respondent authorities to promptly hear the company&#039;s representative and decide on the release of the imported goods within a week. This decision aimed to ensure a swift resolution while upholding the importance of following established statutory procedures in customs matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 19:02:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 425 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370082</link>
      <description>The court emphasized the availability of statutory remedies under the Customs Act for aggrieved parties and declined to entertain the plea under its extraordinary jurisdiction. Instead, it directed the respondent authorities to promptly hear the company&#039;s representative and decide on the release of the imported goods within a week. This decision aimed to ensure a swift resolution while upholding the importance of following established statutory procedures in customs matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>