<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 422 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370079</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order-in-original related to service tax liability, emphasizing that factual disputes and procedural fairness issues should be addressed through review or appeal processes rather than writ jurisdiction. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to seek redress through the appellate authority within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 19:02:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 422 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370079</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order-in-original related to service tax liability, emphasizing that factual disputes and procedural fairness issues should be addressed through review or appeal processes rather than writ jurisdiction. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to seek redress through the appellate authority within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>