<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 418 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370075</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was not applicable as the appellant was entitled to the cenvat credit on the inputs, and there was no evidence of wrongful utilization or refund. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand under Rule 14, ruling in favor of the appellant and allowing the appeal with consequential relief if needed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 19:02:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 418 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370075</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was not applicable as the appellant was entitled to the cenvat credit on the inputs, and there was no evidence of wrongful utilization or refund. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand under Rule 14, ruling in favor of the appellant and allowing the appeal with consequential relief if needed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>