<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 412 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370069</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, holding that the Revenue failed to provide sufficient evidence to support the allegations of ineligible Cenvat credit due to non-receipt and non-use of HR Coils/Sheets in the manufacture of grey iron castings. The Tribunal noted the appellants&#039; use of HR Coils/Sheets during a period of pig iron shortage, supported by external sources. Additionally, technical expert opinions were deemed unreliable as they were not cross-examined, and procedural compliance and investigation adequacy were criticized. As a result, the demands and penalties against the appellants were set aside, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 19:01:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 412 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370069</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, holding that the Revenue failed to provide sufficient evidence to support the allegations of ineligible Cenvat credit due to non-receipt and non-use of HR Coils/Sheets in the manufacture of grey iron castings. The Tribunal noted the appellants&#039; use of HR Coils/Sheets during a period of pig iron shortage, supported by external sources. Additionally, technical expert opinions were deemed unreliable as they were not cross-examined, and procedural compliance and investigation adequacy were criticized. As a result, the demands and penalties against the appellants were set aside, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>