https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276387 The criminal revision petition (Cr. Rev. No. 1788 of 2010) involved a case where the petitioner sought permission to lead secondary evidence regarding an agreement to sell and pronote-receipt, which were allegedly destroyed by witnesses. The court upheld the trial court's decision to dismiss the application for secondary evidence, emphasizing the importance of producing the best evidence available, with the original document being the primary source. The judgment highlighted risks of fraud and contractual disputes if secondary evidence is allowed when the original document has been destroyed by a party. Consequently, the criminal revision petition was dismissed for lack of merit. en-us Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Nov 2018 15:43:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276387 The criminal revision petition (Cr. Rev. No. 1788 of 2010) involved a case where the petitioner sought permission to lead secondary evidence regarding an agreement to sell and pronote-receipt, which were allegedly destroyed by witnesses. The court upheld the trial court's decision to dismiss the application for secondary evidence, emphasizing the importance of producing the best evidence available, with the original document being the primary source. The judgment highlighted risks of fraud and contractual disputes if secondary evidence is allowed when the original document has been destroyed by a party. Consequently, the criminal revision petition was dismissed for lack of merit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276387