<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (2) TMI 114 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276371</link>
    <description>A section 34 notice referring to escaped income for a stated accounting period can support reassessment of undisclosed income assessable in the relevant assessment year, even where the income arose from a source outside the period specifically mentioned in the notice. The statutory scheme treated the previous year as the financial year ending 31 March 1946, unless the assessee had validly adopted a different accounting year for that source. Because no separate accounting year had been chosen or disclosed for the money-lending business, the revenue was entitled to apply the statutory previous year and include the escaped income in reassessment. The assessee&#039;s objection therefore failed, and the reassessment was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 14:10:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (2) TMI 114 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276371</link>
      <description>A section 34 notice referring to escaped income for a stated accounting period can support reassessment of undisclosed income assessable in the relevant assessment year, even where the income arose from a source outside the period specifically mentioned in the notice. The statutory scheme treated the previous year as the financial year ending 31 March 1946, unless the assessee had validly adopted a different accounting year for that source. Because no separate accounting year had been chosen or disclosed for the money-lending business, the revenue was entitled to apply the statutory previous year and include the escaped income in reassessment. The assessee&#039;s objection therefore failed, and the reassessment was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>