<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Overturned Due to Revenue&#039;s Failure to Fulfill Primary Responsibility in Streedhan Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=42537</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The primary onus on the Revenue being not discharged, while jewellery to some extent accepted as being the assessee’s streedhan, no case for levy of penalty is, under the circumstances, made out.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 11:45:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 11:45:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Overturned Due to Revenue&#039;s Failure to Fulfill Primary Responsibility in Streedhan Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=42537</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The primary onus on the Revenue being not discharged, while jewellery to some extent accepted as being the assessee’s streedhan, no case for levy of penalty is, under the circumstances, made out.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 11:45:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=42537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>