<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1902 (12) TMI 1 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276363</link>
    <description>The Privy Council dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s responsibility for the delay and lack of sufficient cause for the delays. The court upheld previous decisions regarding jurisdiction and admission of the appeal, stating that interference was not warranted unless proven that refusal to admit the appeal out of time was erroneous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 1902 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 11:39:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1902 (12) TMI 1 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276363</link>
      <description>The Privy Council dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s responsibility for the delay and lack of sufficient cause for the delays. The court upheld previous decisions regarding jurisdiction and admission of the appeal, stating that interference was not warranted unless proven that refusal to admit the appeal out of time was erroneous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 1902 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>