<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1902 (12) TMI 1 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276363</link>
    <description>An appeal presented in the wrong court after expiry of the limitation period could not be admitted out of time because sufficient cause for the delay was not shown. The earlier refusal to grant indulgence under the Limitation Act remained undisturbed, and the unexplained delay after the transfer order provided no basis to reopen the issue. On that footing, the High Court&#039;s dismissal of the appeal for want of jurisdiction was correct, and interference was unwarranted absent a satisfactory explanation for the delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 1902 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 11:39:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1902 (12) TMI 1 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276363</link>
      <description>An appeal presented in the wrong court after expiry of the limitation period could not be admitted out of time because sufficient cause for the delay was not shown. The earlier refusal to grant indulgence under the Limitation Act remained undisturbed, and the unexplained delay after the transfer order provided no basis to reopen the issue. On that footing, the High Court&#039;s dismissal of the appeal for want of jurisdiction was correct, and interference was unwarranted absent a satisfactory explanation for the delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 1902 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>