<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (2) TMI 113 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276362</link>
    <description>The court ruled against the assessees, stating that the exemption under the notification was not applicable due to the absence of a deduction claim by the company. The judgment clarified the requirement for the company to claim deductions annually for the assessees to be exempt from taxation on the directors&#039; remuneration. The court directed the assessees to pay the costs of the Commissioner of Income-tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 11:14:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (2) TMI 113 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276362</link>
      <description>The court ruled against the assessees, stating that the exemption under the notification was not applicable due to the absence of a deduction claim by the company. The judgment clarified the requirement for the company to claim deductions annually for the assessees to be exempt from taxation on the directors&#039; remuneration. The court directed the assessees to pay the costs of the Commissioner of Income-tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>