<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 382 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370039</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the assessee the additional depreciation claim under section 32(iia) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal considered the assessee&#039;s seed processing activities as manufacturing, following a similar judgment by the Bombay High Court. As a result, the Tribunal did not address the validity of the notice issued under section 148, deeming it unnecessary due to the favorable decision on the depreciation claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:58:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 382 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370039</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the assessee the additional depreciation claim under section 32(iia) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal considered the assessee&#039;s seed processing activities as manufacturing, following a similar judgment by the Bombay High Court. As a result, the Tribunal did not address the validity of the notice issued under section 148, deeming it unnecessary due to the favorable decision on the depreciation claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>